Officer Refuses to Show Driver the Reading of Speed


By Sonia Hickey and Ugur Nedim

A NSW police officer who pulled over a Sydney motorist over for allegedly speeding has been filmed refusing to show the driver the speed gun reading, then claiming the vehicle is faulty due to a wobbly seat.

Zia Yilda was on his way to work when stopped by the officer and accused of travelling at 83kph in a 60kph zones. Mr Yilda gets out of his car and begins filming the officer with his mobile phone, then asks to see the speed reading on six separate occasions. The officer ignores him and also refuses to provide any details of his identity.

The officer then proceeds to conduct a thorough search of both the interior and exterior of Yilda’s BMW 330 convertible, after the driver invites him to do so.

Wobbly passenger seat

The officer is seen grabbing and yanking at the front passenger seat of the vehicle, then claiming it is defective for being “wobbly”. He goes to great lengths to find further alleged defects, even getting on his knees to take photos. He claims there are problems with the car’s height and suspension, front grill and back tyres.

But the officer doesn’t stop there. He also searches the engine and all of Yilda’s personal belongings, including his laptop bag, bum bag and diabetic kit.

The law

There is no legal requirement for police officers show a drivers the reading of speed.

Indeed, officers will often allege that a motorist was speeding based on their own ‘estimate of speed’, without any digital reading at all.

However, section 202 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) requires an officer who is exercising a police power to provide:

(a) evidence that the police officer is a police officer (unless the police officer is in uniform),

(b) the name of the police officer and his or her place of duty,

(c) the reason for the exercise of the power.

Section 201 of the Act lists the police powers to which the requirement relates, which are:

(a) a power to stop, search or arrest a person,

(b) a power to stop or search a vehicle, vessel or aircraft,

(c) a power to enter or search premises,

(d) a power to seize property,

(e) a power to require the disclosure of the identity of a person (including a power to require the removal of a face covering for identification purposes),

(f) a power to give or make a direction, requirement or request that a person is required to comply with by law,

(g) a power to establish a crime scene at premises (not being a public place).

It appears the officer failed to comply with this requirement.

Mr Yilda claims he was driving at the speed limit and has taken to Facebook to brand the officer’s conduct as “pretty ridiculous”. And while he is yet to receive a fine for the alleged speeding offence, he says he would contest any such penalty notice.


previous post: Dead, Dying and Injured Dogs Discovered at Alleged Puppy Farm

next post: NSW Court Rules that Identification Based Partly on a Media Report is Admissible

Author Image

About Sydney Criminal Lawyers

Sydney Criminal Lawyers is Sydney's Leading Criminal Defence firm, Delivering Outstanding Results in all Criminal and Driving cases. Going to Court? Call (02) 9261 8881 for a Free Consultation.

One comment

  1. B.G. Fraser

    Interesting concept of the law, in regards to police not showing the driver evidence of speeding. Is this a determinable design of police powers and their laws, to remain in a gray zone of not being liable to be held accountable for ‘false’ bookings.
    If anything, this should change immediately. Having video evidence in a citizens hands is a powerful tool to equal balance on police powers, and as such, I believe, that once requested, any evidence of incrimination for ‘alleged’ speeding, should be handed over.

  • (will not be published)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>