Save Izzy! A Family’s Quest to Save Their Dog’s Life

Legal history has been made in Victoria after a family was given permission to appeal their pet pet dog’s death sentence to the High Court of Australia.

The Staffordshire terrier, named Izzy, escaped from the family home and bit a woman on the finger in 2012.

The incident led to charges being laid against Izzy’s owner, and Melbourne’s Knox City Council sought an order for the dog to be ‘destroyed’.

Izzy was seized in June 2013 and has been kept in a cage at an animal shelter ever since.

Her owner appealed the ‘destruction order’ to the Victorian Supreme Court and then up to the Supreme Court’s ‘Court of Appeal’, but both denied the appeals.

But in a last-minute reprieve, the High Court has agreed to hear a final appeal.

This is believed to be the first time that the High Court will hear the case of a dog on death row.

The basis for the appeal

The main ground of appeal is that the council officer who brought the original charges against Izzy’s owner also sat on the panel that made the decision for the dog to be destroyed.

The council’s lawyer contended that the officer handled the matter in a professional manner and without prior judgement.

The case for Izzy is also supported by the fact that the nature injury sustained by the woman who was bitten was not severe – a laceration approximately 1.5cm in length on the finger.

The legal wrangling

An appeal to the Supreme Court challenging the decision to destroy Izzy was unsuccessful, and in September last year, the Victorian Court of Appeal upheld that judgement.

The decision to allow a special leave application to the High Court is a first, but it is expected that others will follow once a precedent has been set.

In Adelaide, another case is underway involving a five-year-old American Staffordshire terrier who is due to be destroyed after it was alleged that he killed three cats after escaping from his home.

The dog’s owners deny the claim that their dog killed any cats and blame his escape on medication he was on after an accident.

The matter is due in court today.

Dangerous dog laws in NSW

The NSW Government has been tightening dangerous dog laws over the last couple of years.

New legislation approved in 2013 allows dogs that have never attacked a person to be categorised as ‘menacing’ in NSW.

The amendments to the Companion Animals Act are a pre-emptive measure, and were brought into effect after a spate of dog attacks in NSW.

One attack resulted in the tragic death of a two-year-old from a dog that had not previously been considered dangerous.

Dangerous dogs

The law in NSW states that a dog can be declared ‘dangerous’ if council rangers believe that it has:

  • without provocation, attacked or killed a person or animal (other than vermin)
  • without provocation, repeatedly tried to attack or chase a person or animal
  • displayed unreasonable aggression towards another person or animal

If a dog is declared dangerous, its owner must comply with a range of strict requirements including that:

  • the dog must be de-sexed within 28 days
  • it must be muzzled and on a leash whenever in public
  • it must not at any time be in the sole charge of a person under 18,
  • a ‘Warning Dangerous Dog’ sign must be affixed to the property, and
  • a ‘yellow and red’ dangerous dog collar must be worn, and
  • it must remain within a council approved dog enclosure (ie dog case) unless it is muzzled.

Menacing dogs

The council can declare a dog to be menacing if it has:

  • displayed unreasonable aggression towards a person or animal (other than vermin), or
  • without provocation, attacked a person or animal (other than vermin) but without causing serious injury or death.

If a dog is declared to be menacing, the owner must comply with all of the above requirements except the last one, which is the most stringent.

Rather than having to build a dog enclosure and keep the dog in it, there is a general requirement that the owner needs to keep the dog in a place that the dog cannot escape from.

Challenging an order in NSW

If council sends you a notice of a proposed dangerous dog declaration, you have 7 days to write a letter objecting to the declaration.

That letter can contain supporting documents such as a temperament assessment by a trained dog assessor, photos of your home and yard showing that it is secure, letters from your vet and those who have been around your dog, and so on.

If council still goes ahead and declares your dog to be dangerous, you have 28 days to file an appeal to the Local Court against the declaration.

A court date will then be set and you may be able to negotiate an agreement with council; for example, you may be able to agree to keep your dog on a leash at all times when in public etc, in exchange for council agreeing to revoke the dangerous dog declaration.

If an agreement is reached, it will essentially be ‘rubber stamped’ by the Local Court who will issue what are known as ‘control orders.

Otherwise, the matter will need to be fought in court.

The Local Court has the authority to revoke a dangerous dog declaration and if it decides to revoke it, the court can make other orders that it deems appropriate, including training, desexing and any other requirements.

The court also has the authority to revoke any destruction order sought by the local council.

If you wish to accept the dangerous dog declaration, you can still lodge an appeal to the council after 12 months.

The situation with menacing dog order is significantly different because you do not have the right to appeal to the Local Court, which is a state of affairs that many find to be unfair and unacceptable.

The lack of an external appeal mechanism is also why councils often prefer menacing dog orders over dangerous dog orders.

Fighting a dangerous dog order

Challenging a council’s dangerous dog declaration can be extremely stressful.

Emotions can run high, especially if you believe that your beloved companion has not done anything wrong and that the council is being unfair.

It is especially nerve-wracking if your dog has been seized and thrown into a pound; particularly if the council has applied for a destruction order.

If you have received a ‘notice of intention to declare your dog dangerous’, it can be helpful to seek the services of a lawyer with expertise and experience in dangerous dog cases.

Although Sydney Criminal Lawyers is primarily a criminal defence firm, we are also passionate defenders of animal rights.

In fact, our principal Mr Nedim has been representing dog owners since shortly after the Companion Animals Act came into effect.

He pioneered the use of ‘undertakings’ as a way to prevent councils from going ahead with dangerous dog declarations, and has successfully defended clients against hundreds of applications over the past 15 years.

If you would like more information about dangerous dog applications and menacing dog orders, jump onto our website page or click on the links below to browse through our many videos and blogs including:

You can also have a look through our dedicated website:

previous post: Illegal Downloaders Could be Bullied into Paying Settlements

next post: Should Terrorism Suspects Get the ‘Benefit of the Doubt’?

Author Image

About Ugur Nedim

Ugur Nedim is an Accredited Specialist Criminal Lawyer and Principal at Sydney Criminal Lawyers, Sydney's leading firm of criminal and traffic defence lawyers.
  • (will not be published)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>