Going to Court? Book Your Free First Appointment

Interfering with a Monitoring Device when It is a Condition of an Extended Supervision Order or Interim Supervision Order

Interfering with a monitoring device when it is a condition of an extended supervision order or interim supervision order is an offence under section 105A.18B(1) of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) which carries a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison.

To establish the offence, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that:

  1. You were subject to an extended supervision order or interim supervision order,
  2. A condition of the order was to wear a monitoring device, and,
  3. You engaged in conduct resulting in interference with, or disruption or loss of a function of the device or any related monitoring equipment.

You are not guilty if your conduct occurred while your order was lawfully suspended.

Self-defence, duress and necessity are defences to the charge.

What Our Clients Say SEE ALL

  • ★★★★★


    Kent Park is a legend.

  • ★★★★★

    An unbiased and fair hearing to attain the correct judicial sentencing

    Unfortunately I found myself in a position that I needed a lawyer. Although on the…

  • ★★★★★

    Truly an outstanding lawyer

    I highly recommend Lingwei Kong for legal representation. Lingwei combines professionalism with a personal touch,…

  • ★★★★★

    Great result thanks to Lingwei and his team from Sydney Criminal Lawyers

    Hi all I ingaged lingwei to represent myself with a police matter at Liverpool court…

Going to Court? Call For Your Free First Appointment

Main Menu

Follow Us

Ask Our AI Assistant

Disclaimer: Response is AI generated general advice only and should not be relied upon without consulting a lawyer.

Saved Articles & Pages


Preferred date for conference
Briefly describe your situation:
Do you have a court date?

Your Review & Rating * mandatory fields

Review Text *
Rating (optional)