Going to Court? Book Your Free First Appointment

Sabotage With Recklessness as to National Security

Sabotage with recklessness as to national security is an offence under section 82.6 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) which carries a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison.

To establish the offence, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that:

  1. You engaged in conduct that resulted in damage to public infrastructure, and
  2. You were reckless as to whether your conduct would prejudice Australia’s national security, or advantage the national security of a foreign country.

‘Public infrastructure’ is defined as:

  1. Any infrastructure, facility, premises, network or electronic system that belongs to the CommonwealthDefence premises within the meaning of the Defence Act 1903
  2. Service property or service land under the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982
  3. Telecommunications infrastructure under the Telecommunications Act 1997
  4. Any infrastructure, facility, premises, network or electronic system that:
  • Provides or relates to providing the public with utilities, services or food, or
  • Is located in Australia and belongs to or is operated by constitutional corporation or is used to facilitate constitutional trade or commerce, or
  1. Food intended for the public and produced, distributed or sold by a constitutional corporation for trade or commerce.

Your conduct caused ‘damage to public infrastructure’ if it:

  1. Destroyed or resulted in its destruction
  2. Interfered with or abandoned it resulting in loss or unserviceability
  3. Resulted in loss of function, unsafety or unfitness for purpose
  4. Limited or prevented access by persons ordinarily entitled to access
  5. Resulted in defectiveness or contamination
  6. Degraded its quality, or
  7. Seriously disrupted an electronic system.

‘National security’ is defined as:

  1. Defence of the country
  2. Protection of the country or part thereof
  3. Protection of the country’s people
  4. Protection of the integrity of the country’s territory or borders from serious threats
  5. Carrying out the country’s responsibilities towards any other country in terms of protecting territory or borders, or preventing espionage, sabotage, terrorism or political violence
  6. The country’s political, military or economic relations with another country
  7. Protection against espionage, sabotage, terrorism or political violence
  8. Protection against obstruction, hinderance or interference with the defence force, or
  9. Foreign interference.

‘Prejudice’ does not include embarrassment alone.

‘Advantage’ does not include conduct that benefits Australia as much or more than the foreign country.

You were ‘reckless’ if you were aware there was a substantial risk that your conduct would prejudice Australia’s national security, or advantage the national security of a foreign country, and it was unjustifiable to take that risk, but you went ahead with your actions regardless.

Defences to the charge include duress and self-defence.

What Our Clients Say SEE ALL

  • ★★★★★

    He always knew how to communicate with me even im not English speaker person

    I got the best outcome possible after working hard and doing things to help my…

  • ★★★★★

    Definitely the best law firm in Sydney

    I was assisted by Vinny Vijay. He is a wonderful lawyer and human being. He…

  • ★★★★★

    Well informed about every law and option possible

    Hello everyone, my name is Nicolas and I’m writing a more than well deserved 5…

  • ★★★★★

    Amazing communication and service with great results!

    Thank you Tuan!! Such amazing communication and service with great results! Highly recommended!

Going to Court? Call For Your Free First Appointment