Going to Court? Book Your Free First Appointment

Using a Carriage Service to Groom a Person Under the Age of 16 Years for Sexual Activity With You

Using a carriage service to groom a person under the age of 16 years for sexual activity with you is an offence under section 474.27(1) of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), which carries a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison.

To establish the offence, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that:

  1. You were at least 18 years of age
  2. You used a carriage service to transmit a communication to another person (the recipient)
  3. You did so intending to make it easier to procure the recipient to engage in sexual activity with you, and
  4. The recipient was under 16 years of age, or you believed him or her to be under that age.

A ‘carriage service’ is:

‘a service for carrying communications by means of guided and/or unguided electromagnetic energy’, which includes telephone calls, text messages and internet transmissions such as emails and social media messaging.

‘Sexual activity’ includes a broad range of conduct of a sexual nature including sexual intercourse, sexual touching and masturbation.

To ‘procure’ is to encourage, entice, recruit or induce, whether by threats, promises or otherwise.

You are not guilty of the offence if you establish to the court on the balance of probabilities that you believed the recipient was at least 16 years of age.

For the purpose of establishing your belief about age, any representation made to you that the recipient was under, of or over a certain age is proof that you believed he or she was of the represented age, unless there is evidence to the contrary.

When determining your belief about age, the court may consider a range of matters including:

  1. The recipient’s appearance
  2. Any medical or other scientific opinion
  3. Any document that is or appears to be an official or medical record from outside Australia, and
  4. Any document that appears to be a copy of such a record.

It is immaterial that the recipient was a fictitious person representing themselves as a real person.

You may be found guilty even if it was impossible for the sexual activity to take place.

You are not guilty if you attempted but failed to convey the communication to the recipient.

Duress is a defence to the charge.

What Our Clients Say SEE ALL

  • ★★★★★

    Outstanding efforts in resolving my matter

    I just wanted to thank Karina for her outstanding efforts in resolving my matter. Karina…

  • ★★★★★

    My case turned out better than I could’ve hoped for!

    Wissam Philopos is the best! Very attentive, nice, and my case turned out better than…

  • ★★★★★

    A small mistake got me into a big trouble

    A small mistake got me into a big trouble. WISSAM PHILIPPOS, is a good lawyer,…

  • ★★★★★

    Happy with the outcome today

    External happy with the outcome today Wissam Philopos is a legend of a lawyer and…

Going to Court? Call For Your Free First Appointment