Going to Court? Book Your Free First Appointment

Using a Postal or Similar Service to Procure a Child Under the Age of 16 Years for Sexual Activity

Using a postal or similar service to procure a child under the age of 16 years for sexual activity is an offence under section 471.24(1) of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), which carries a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison.

To establish the offence, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that:

  1. You were at least 18 years of age
  2. You caused an article to be carried by a postal or similar service to another person (the recipient)
  3. You did so with the intention to procure the recipient to engage in sexual activity with you, and
  4. The recipient was under 16 years of age, or you believed he or she was under that age.

To ‘procure’ is to encourage, entice, recruit or induce, whether by threats, promises or otherwise.

‘Sexual activity’ includes sexual intercourse, sexual touching and other acts of a sexual nature.

You are not guilty of the offence if you establish to the court on the balance of probabilities that you believed the recipient to be at least 16 years of age. For the purpose of establishing your belief about the recipient’s age, any representation made to you that he or she was under, of or over a certain age is proof that you believed he or she was of the represented age unless there is evidence to the contrary.

When determining your belief about age, the court may consider a range of matters including:

  1. The recipient’s appearance
  2. Any medical or other scientific opinion
  3. Any document that is or appears to be an official or medical record from outside Australia, and
  4. Any document that appears to be a copy of such a record.

It is immaterial that the recipient was a fictitious person representing themselves as a real person.

You are not guilty if you attempted but failed to convey the article to the recipient.

Duress and necessity are defences to the charge.

What Our Clients Say SEE ALL

  • ★★★★★

    Got me the best possible outcome, her knowledge and skills helped me a lot

    Coincidering my charges lawyer Karina got me the best possible outcome, her knowledge and skills…

  • ★★★★★

    Better than expected outcome

    Patrick performed well under unexpected time pressure today. I engaged Patrick's services to defend me…

  • ★★★★★

    Extremely happy with outcome

    Big thank you to Fred Cao who was representing me today. Explained step by step…

  • ★★★★★

    No conviction for my father’s driving offence

    Wissam successfully got a no conviction for my father’s driving offence which will enable him…

Going to Court? Call For Your Free First Appointment