Section 25A of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 is Ongoing Supply and is extracted below.
If you would like an experienced drug defence lawyer to provide accurate advice and outstanding representation for your Ongoing Supply case, call Sydney Criminal Lawyers® today on (02) 9261 8881 for a free first appointment.
Our criminal lawyers are experts in defending drug charges and have a proven track record in obtaining superior results in all types of drug cases.
25A Offence of supplying prohibited drugs on an ongoing basis
(1) Offence provision A person who, on 3 or more separate occasions during any period of 30 consecutive days, supplies a prohibited drug (other than cannabis) for financial or material reward is guilty of an offence. Maximum penalty: 3,500 penalty units or imprisonment for 20 years, or both.
(2) Same prohibited drug not necessary A person is liable to be convicted of an offence under this section whether or not the same prohibited drug is supplied on each of the occasions relied on as evidence of commission of the offence.
(3) Jury must be satisfied as to same 3 occasions of supply If, on the trial of a person for an offence under this section, more than 3 occasions of supplying a prohibited drug are relied on as evidence of commission of the offence, all the members of the jury must be satisfied as to the same 3 occasions in order to find the person guilty of the offence.
(4) Alternative verdict–relevant supply offences If, on the trial of a person for an offence under this section, the jury is not satisfied that the offence is proven but is satisfied that the person has, in respect of any of the occasions relied on as evidence of commission of the offence under this section, committed a relevant supply offence, the jury may acquit the person of the offence charged and find the person guilty of the relevant supply offence, and the person is liable to punishment accordingly.
(5) Double jeopardy provisions A person who has been convicted of an offence under this section is not liable to be convicted:
(a) of a relevant supply offence, or
(b) of a separate offence under this section,
on the same, or substantially the same, facts as those relied on as evidence of commission of the offence in respect of which the person has been convicted.
(6) A person who has been acquitted of an offence under this section is not liable to be convicted:
(a) except as provided by subsection (4)–of a relevant supply offence, or
(b) of a separate offence under this section,
on the same, or substantially the same, facts as those relied on as evidence of commission of the offence in respect of which the person has been acquitted.
(7) A person who has been:
(a) convicted of a relevant supply offence, or
(b) acquitted of a relevant supply offence,
is not liable to be convicted for an offence under this section on the same, or substantially the same, facts as those relied on as evidence of commission of the relevant supply offence.
(8) Liability for relevant supply offences not affected by offence under this section Subject to subsections (5) and (6), this section does not:
(a) remove the liability of any person to be convicted of a relevant supply offence, or
(b) affect the punishment that may be imposed for any such offence.
(9) Exemption–lawful supply Nothing in this section renders unlawful the supply of a prohibited drug by:
(a) a person licensed or authorised to do so under the Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966, or
(b) a person acting in accordance with an authority granted by the Director-General of the Department of Health where the Director-General is satisfied that the supply of the prohibited drug is for the purpose of scientific research, instruction, analysis or study.
(10) Definitions In this section:”cannabis” means cannabis leaf, cannabis oil, cannabis plant and cannabis resin.”relevant supply offence” means any offence under this Act (other than under this section) relating to the supply of a prohibited drug.
Why Sydney Criminal Lawyers®?
Choosing the right legal team to defend your reputation and interests can be a difficult process.
However, it is always important to look at a firm’s experience and results when making this decision.
At Sydney Criminal Lawyers®, we have extensive experience defending and winning some of the most complex criminal matters – so you can rest assured that you are in safe hands.
Our criminal law specialists will take the time in every case to carefully scrutinise all the evidence in order to identify problems with the prosecution case at an early stage in the proceedings.
Where issues are found, our lawyers will write to the prosecution asking to have the charges dropped on this basis – often sparing our clients the considerable time and expense associated with defended hearings.
However, should your matter proceed to court, our senior lawyers will represent you and present a strong defence case to maximise your chances of being found ‘not guilty.’
Our senior lawyers are highly skilled advocates who have been recognised for their expert knowledge of the criminal law, as well as their ability to obtain excellent results in difficult cases.
We can assist you in avoiding the harsh penalties imposed by the law if you simply wish to plead guilty – in these cases, our experienced advocates can prepare and present compelling sentencing submissions which focus on any positive factors of your case.
For the best defence in your case, get the experts on your side today. Call us now on
(02) 9261 8881 and book your FREE first conference with our criminal law specialists.
Suspended Sentence for Ongoing Drug Supply and Participate in Criminal Group
Sydney Criminal Lawyers® obtained 'Suspended Sentences' (no prison) in Downing Centre District Court for our 22 year old client for 'Supply Drug on Ongoing Basis', 11 charges of 'Supply Prohibited Drug' and 'Participate in Criminal Group'.
The case involved the supply of approximately 60 ounces of heroin and cocaine over several months.
Our Ugur Nedim persuasively presented the case before the Downing Centre District Court Judge who ultimately found exceptional circumstances in our client's favour and refrained from sending him to prison.
All involved had expected a lengthy prison sentence.
It is an incredible result considering that our client has several previous criminal convictions, and the official sentencing statistics for similar offenders say that 100% were sent to prison.
Ongoing Drug Supply Charges Dismissed
In Parramatta District Court, Sydney Criminal Lawyers® had all charges dismissed against a 26 year old man accused of supplying 'ice' and 'ecstacy' on an 'ongoing basis'.
This result was obtained despite there being police surveillance and telephone intercepts allegedly establishing that our client supplied the drugs on at least 12 occasions over nearly 6 weeks.