Officer Refuses to Show Driver the Reading of Speed

by &
Information on this page was reviewed by a specialist defence lawyer before being published. Click to read more.
Police radar

A NSW police officer who pulled over a Sydney motorist over for allegedly speeding has been filmed refusing to show the driver the speed gun reading, then claiming the vehicle is faulty due to a wobbly seat.

Zia Yilda was on his way to work when stopped by the officer and accused of travelling at 83kph in a 60kph zones. Mr Yilda gets out of his car and begins filming the officer with his mobile phone, then asks to see the speed reading on six separate occasions. The officer ignores him and also refuses to provide any details of his identity.

The officer then proceeds to conduct a thorough search of both the interior and exterior of Yilda’s BMW 330 convertible, after the driver invites him to do so.

Wobbly passenger seat

The officer is seen grabbing and yanking at the front passenger seat of the vehicle, then claiming it is defective for being “wobbly”. He goes to great lengths to find further alleged defects, even getting on his knees to take photos. He claims there are problems with the car’s height and suspension, front grill and back tyres.

But the officer doesn’t stop there. He also searches the engine and all of Yilda’s personal belongings, including his laptop bag, bum bag and diabetic kit.

The law

There is no legal requirement for police officers show a drivers the reading of speed.

Indeed, officers will often allege that a motorist was speeding based on their own ‘estimate of speed’, without any digital reading at all.

However, section 202 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) requires an officer who is exercising a police power to provide:

(a) evidence that the police officer is a police officer (unless the police officer is in uniform),

(b) the name of the police officer and his or her place of duty,

(c) the reason for the exercise of the power.

Section 201 of the Act lists the police powers to which the requirement relates, which are:

(a) a power to stop, search or arrest a person,

(b) a power to stop or search a vehicle, vessel or aircraft,

(c) a power to enter or search premises,

(d) a power to seize property,

(e) a power to require the disclosure of the identity of a person (including a power to require the removal of a face covering for identification purposes),

(f) a power to give or make a direction, requirement or request that a person is required to comply with by law,

(g) a power to establish a crime scene at premises (not being a public place).

It appears the officer failed to comply with this requirement.

Mr Yilda claims he was driving at the speed limit and has taken to Facebook to brand the officer’s conduct as “pretty ridiculous”. And while he is yet to receive a fine for the alleged speeding offence, he says he would contest any such penalty notice.

Going to court for a traffic offence?

If you are going to court for a traffic offence, call or email Sydney Criminal Lawyers anytime to arrange a free first consultation with an experienced, specialist traffic lawyer who will accurately advise you of your options, the best way forward, and fight for the optimal outcome in your specific situation.

Last updated on

Receive all of our articles weekly


Sonia Hickey

Sonia Hickey is a freelance writer, magazine journalist, and owner of 'Woman with Words'. She has a strong interest in social justice and is a member of the Sydney Criminal Lawyers® content team. Sonia is the winner of the Mondaq Thought Leadership Awards, Spring 2022.
Ugur Nedim

Ugur Nedim

Ugur Nedim is an Accredited Criminal Law Specialist with 25 years of experience as a Criminal Defence Lawyer. He is the Principal of Sydney Criminal Lawyers®.

Your Opinion Matters