Victoria Increases Police Powers and Removes Legal Safeguards


By Sonia Hickey and Ugur Nedim

The recent weeks, the bulk of Victoria’s Justice Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Bill 2018 has been enacted, which the state government claims will better protect the community against the threat of terrorism.

The changes include new powers for police to detain suspects without charge or a court order for up to four days, and to use lethal force.

Police are also allowed to detain children aged 14 years and over for up to 36 hours.

Expert panel’s recommendations

The laws are based on key recommendations by the government’s Expert Panel on Terrorism and Violent Extremism Prevention and Response Powers, which was led by former Police Commissioner Ken Lay.

The panel has, however, been criticised for being comprised of members strongly in favour of increased police and state powers at the expense of fundamental legal protections and safeguards of citizens.

Police fast becoming judges, jurors and executioners

Indeed, the laws give the police enormous discretion to determine who should be targeted, and have been criticised for undermining the separation of powers due to the lack of judicial oversight.

They allow police to detain a person for up to 14 days without charge if police say they suspect the person of planning a terrorist act that is “is capable of being carried out and could occur within 14 days.

New presumptions against the granting of bail for those who are charged with terrorism offences have also been enacted, diluting the presumption of innocence.

An additional $20m was earmarked in the in the Victorian Annual budget to implement the changes, much of which is going to the state’s police service.

And there’s more…

Police have also been given the power to use lethal force where they believe a terrorism incident is occurring, without being subjected to the same level of scrutiny as other killings.

They have also been given additional powers to cordon off areas, request proof of identity and search people and premises without the usual ‘reasonable suspicion’ of wrongdoing.

Following in the authoritarian footsteps of the ‘premier state’

The laws bring Victoria substantially in line with New South Wales, which has introduced a suite of laws in recent years to give police and state agents additional powers at the expense of individual freedoms – all in the name of protecting against the threat of terrorism.

The NSW laws include:

As a further indication of law enforcement’s militarisation, more police officers are being equipped with semi-automatic weapons ostensibly to protect against the threat of terrorism.

But many question whether these powers will actually keep us safe – or whether the threat of terrorism is conveniently being used to unjustifiably bolster state control at the expense of important legal safeguards and valuable personal freedoms.


previous post: Socially Progressive, Economically Sensible: An Interview with Independent, Dr Kerryn Phelps

next post: Church-led Coalition Calls for Drug Decriminalisation

Author Image

About Sydney Criminal Lawyers

Sydney Criminal Lawyers® is Sydney's Leading Criminal Defence firm, Delivering Outstanding Results in all Criminal and Driving cases. Going to Court? Call (02) 9261 8881 for a Free Consultation.
  • (will not be published)

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>