R v Rondo – Reasonable Suspicion Explained

by Ugur Nedim

Contrary to popular belief, police officers are not allowed to just randomly search people, vehicles and premises for drugs, unless they have a good reason to believe that someone is in possession of an illegal substance.

If you have been charged with a drug offence, and you believe that police may have obtained their evidence against you illegally, it is best to speak to a drug lawyer as soon as possible.

You may be able to have your charges withdrawn, if you can prove that police acted in an illegal manner.

What is reasonable suspicion?

The leading definition of reasonable suspicion is R v Rondo. Reasonable suspicion is when police have a genuine cause to suspect that you may be carrying an illegal substance or prohibited item about your person, or in your vehicle, at that particular time.

To be classed as reasonable suspicion, the belief needs to be more than a possibility but need not amount to a reasonable belief.

This suspicion needs to have a factual basis, it can’t be based only on speculation or hearsay, and the police officer needs to have a reasonable suspicion at the time of stopping and searching the person or vehicle, not at a later time.

The evidence from the officer needs to be considered in the context of all the circumstances at the time.

What is not reasonable suspicion?

Reasonable suspicion does not include a previous drug conviction, appearing nervous or fidgety, being in the company of other people they suspect of having drugs, or being in a known drug area.

When can police search me?

If a sniffer dog detects the presence of drugs on your person, and there are additional factual matters which raise the police officer’s suspicions, this may be considered enough for a police officer to conduct a search.

For example, if police believe they saw you putting drugs into your pocket, and a sniffer dog then detects the presence of drugs, this would ordinarily be sufficient to enable a search. Equally, if several of the above-mentioned factors are present at the one time, and there is a subsequent positive indication, this may be enough for the search to be legal.

Police sniffer dogs are required to be kept under control, and not to touch you any more than necessary during the search.

What should I do if I think police searched me illegally?

If you believe you have been searched without reasonable suspicion, then you may be able to have any charges against you dismissed.

As long as you can prove that the police did not have reasonable suspicion to search you, any evidence obtained through an illegal search will not be admissible in court, and unless there is further evidence against you, there is a good chance you will be able to have the charges against you withdrawn.

If you believe that police officers used unnecessary force to search you, you can also make a complaint.

If you have any doubts as to whether a police search was legal or not, contact a lawyer for advice.

An experienced criminal lawyer will be able to advise you whether or not the police had reasonable suspicion to search you, and if they didn’t, can help you apply to have any charges against you withdrawn, or help you make a formal complaint.


Ugur Nedim

Ugur Nedim is an Accredited Criminal Law Specialist with over 20 years of experience as a criminal defence lawyer. He is the Principal of Sydney Criminal Lawyers®.

Your Opinion Matters